RE: AUDIT question

From: Michael Dinh <mdinh_at_XIFIN.Com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:23:43 -0800
Message-ID: <>

What about creating using with DBA as a not default role?

At the session level, DBA role will have to be set.

Then audit role.

Michael Dinh

Disparity Breaks Automation (DBA)

Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong - Peter T Mcintyre  
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY - This material is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable laws.  BE FURTHER ADVISED THAT THIS EMAIL MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION (PHI). BY ACCEPTING THIS MESSAGE, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOREGOING, AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS: YOU AGREE TO NOT DISCLOSE TO ANY THIRD PARTY ANY PHI CONTAINED HEREIN, EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PERMITTED AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO PERFORM YOUR OBLIGATIONS RELATING TO THE RECEIPT OF THIS MESSAGE.  If the reader of this email (and attachments) is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the error and delete the e-mail you received. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of rjamya Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:10 AM To:
Cc: L
Subject: Re: AUDIT question

in my previous job i used to work for a large multi-national FI, they _exclusively_ audited DBAs. db auditing plus all commands run on unix were logged as well, but other application owners/users were excluded from auditing. :)


On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Powell, Mark <> wrote:

> Do you really need to audit DBA users?


Received on Thu Nov 10 2011 - 13:23:43 CST

Original text of this message