Re: PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS value

From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:10:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJvnOJbFOLbn1mZg0O-OYdXBJ+mZ=tROYBP_3PWoawbCftmaTg_at_mail.gmail.com>

I have seen this problem before. I had an instances with processes set to 1000, and parallel_max_servers defaulted to 985. I am not sure how I was supposed to put enough users on. I manually set the number down to something more reasonable (256 I think). On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:41 AM, LS Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> You got it, I always set 2 to 4 as well but never more than 4 so when this
> guy came to me with the 10xCPU number because he got it from oracle
> documentation I was like who earth set to 10xCPU and therefore my post.
>
> The funny thing is while researching this in MOS i saw another note which
> suggests 10xCPU
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> LSC
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Oct 25 2011 - 09:10:25 CDT