Re: standby redologs ?!!

From: Ram Srinivasan <srinivasanram2004_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:40:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKgSvf-b40+QQyhuQSHK5SVpS+hyALS1nB3Kb80Um0c89MsBBA_at_mail.gmail.com>

Prem: You don't have to follow blindly the manuals. If you have 2 redo log groups on the primary, 2 redo log groups on the secondary (standby) will suffice.
Ram Srinivasan

---

On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Prem <premj_at_rediffmail.com> wrote:

> Friends ,
> I have a question (sorry if I sound too naive) .
>
> 11gR2 manuals say : "The standby redo log must have at least one more redo
> log group than the redo log at the redo source database, for each redo
> thread at the redo source database."
>
> It means - we need 3 standby redo log groups on the standby db if there are
> 2 redo log groups on the primary db . why so ? what is the purpose of that
> one extra group ?
>
> Regards,
> ~ JP ~
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Sincerely
Ram Srinivasan


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Sep 26 2011 - 16:40:07 CDT