securefile: implementation considerations
From: fmhabash <fmhabash_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:44:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4E7B57DC.2080202_at_gmail.com>
Hi all,
Would like to ping some of those who have converted to securefile with 11g. I have reviewed the documentation on OTN and MOS and I need some real-life insights into the following points ...
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:44:28 -0400
Message-ID: <4E7B57DC.2080202_at_gmail.com>
Hi all,
Would like to ping some of those who have converted to securefile with 11g. I have reviewed the documentation on OTN and MOS and I need some real-life insights into the following points ...
- It has been consistent for Oracle in almost all docs to 'somehow' assoicate the storage and performance gains with enabling 'compression and dedup'. Both require some extra $$. However, you need not enable these to still gain these benefits as compared to basicfile. Any comments?
- If you have converted to SF, did you enable cache? If yes, How would this impact your overall SGA performance?
- I have seen that most issues/bugs have been resolved with 11.2.0.2.3 (our release). Did you run into any of these bugs at all?
Thank you.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Sep 22 2011 - 10:44:28 CDT