Re: Considerations to choose SUN server for Oracle

From: Greg Rahn <greg_at_structureddata.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:58:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGXkmit8fB-4x60F5kJ43nLFY3sSZU7Ek3PbRvwvEOQUOLiuBw_at_mail.gmail.com>



New stuff is coming also:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/22/oracle_sparc_t4_hot_chips/

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:24 AM, steve montgomerie <stmontgo_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I am guessing that this feedback is the same for the SPARC T3-4
> Server. It's being presented to us a suggested new platform. Based on
> the
> discussions here I would imagine that it will be the same problem with
> even more cores that are simply denser and not very perforamnt (is
> that a word? -)
>
> Thanks for any feedback you can offer on the T3-4 server list.
>
> Steve
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Denis <denis.sun_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hi, listers,
>>
>> Currently we have a Sun-Fire-15000  16CPUs  64 GB RAM, we need to move db to
>> another data center and thus is allowed to propose to buy a new server with
>> double compacity probably. I am wondering what type of Sun Server we can
>> consider? T5440 or E25K? what kind of considerations are there?

-- 
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Aug 23 2011 - 12:58:56 CDT

Original text of this message