Re: RAC design question

From: Frits Hoogland <frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 09:57:33 +0200
Message-ID: <30111246484227183_at_unknownmsgid>

With the clusterware you can setup a service for every schema which can fail over to another instance.

Frits Hoogland

http://fritshoogland.wordpress.com
mailto:frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com <frits.hoogland_at_gmail.com> cell: +31 6 53569942

Op 6 aug. 2011 om 08:22 heeft Toon Koppelaars <toon.koppelaars_at_rulegen.com> het volgende geschreven:

I think you've answered that design question very wisely.

On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Walker, Jed S <Jed_Walker_at_cable.comcast.com
> wrote:

> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> I’m new to RAC, but have a question. We have a 5 node RAC that supports
> multiple markets each of which has its own schema. Due to each market having
> its own schema, there is no sharing of blocks between markets. As such, I am
> thinking that it would make sense to have each market work on only one node
> because that would avoid having blocks passed between nodes, and thus should
> be good for performance. (Note: the intent behind RAC was for high
> availability, not for scaling, each node can handle the workload of multiple
> markets).****
>
> ** **
>
> Thoughts?****
>
> ** **
>
> **- **Jed****
>
> ** **
>

-- 
Toon Koppelaars
RuleGen BV
Toon.Koppelaars_at_RuleGen.com
www.RuleGen.com
TheHelsinkiDeclaration.blogspot.com

(co)Author: "Applied Mathematics for Database Professionals"
www.rulegen.com/am4dp-backcover-text

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sat Aug 06 2011 - 02:57:33 CDT