Re: Shareplex

From: kyle Hailey <kylelf_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:49:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CADsdiQh4sG7Y40+seOyAnKrE0+YOOE00ZNrha6YZh910uRa6EA_at_mail.gmail.com>

Shareplex is cheeper than Goldengate?!

Everyone in this thread has been saying how expensive Shareplex is.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Connor McDonald <mcdonald.connor_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> *Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?*
>
> $20K per cpu might be a reason :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, kyle Hailey <kylelf_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Goldengate vs Shareplex
>> Why would someone choose Shareplex over Goldengate?
>>
>> just curious, not really in the market.
>>
>> - Kyle
>> http://dboptimizer.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Vishal Gupta <vishal_at_vishalgupta.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I have used Shareplex in past back in 9i and 10g days when Oracle AQ
>>> could scale up to replicate 10-15million transaction/day and still keep data
>>> latency low. Shareplex was great for Oracle to Oracle replication. I dont
>>> know about the price though.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for something cross RDBMS, then you could also go for
>>> GoldenGate.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Jul 2011, at 17:07, Amaral, Rui wrote:
>>>
>>> > We had it at my previous employer a few years ago as well. It worked
>>> but expensive and a bit of a memory hog in our environment.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
>>> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Bill Ferguson
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:05 PM
>>> > To: RStorey_at_dcso.nashville.org
>>> > Cc: oracle-l-freelists
>>> > Subject: Re: Shareplex
>>> >
>>> > Tried it several years ago and finally dropped it. It was SUPER
>>> > expensive, and we (myself and the Quest folks) could never get it to
>>> > work correctly with Oracle 10g and Windows 2003 Server. Everything
>>> > they tried still failed, so after spending $65K on it and over a year
>>> > of effort, we dropped it.
>>> >
>>> > You are also prety much correct in what it does, though the setup for
>>> > it was far less than dataguard.
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -- Bill Ferguson
>>> > --
>>> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. Unauthorized
>>> use/disclosure prohibited. If received in error, please go to
>>> www.td.com/legal for instructions.
>>> > AVIS : Message confidentiel dont le contenu peut être privilégié.
>>> Utilisation/divulgation interdites sans permission. Si reçu par erreur,
>>> prière d'aller au www.td.com/francais/avis_juridique pour des
>>> instructions.
>>> > --
>>> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Connor McDonald
> ===========================
> email: connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com
> web: http://www.oracledba.co.uk
>
> "Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat"
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Aug 01 2011 - 23:49:55 CDT