Re: FRA f/s block size
From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:33:28 +1100
Message-ID: <4D919958.7040707_at_iinet.net.au>
"they did it"? They did what?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:33:28 +1100
Message-ID: <4D919958.7040707_at_iinet.net.au>
"they did it"? They did what?
Thanks for the pointers.
-- Cheers Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia dbvision_at_iinet.net.au Allen, Brandon wrote,on my timestamp of 29/03/2011 1:50 AM:Received on Tue Mar 29 2011 - 03:33:28 CDT
> I'm guessing they did it to enable concurrent IO to the online redo logs, which should give better I/O performance for those files as described here:
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10839/appa_aix.htm#sthref492
>
> And on here (p.26):
>
> http://public.dhe.ibm.com/partnerworld/pub/whitepaper/162b6.pdf
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l