RE: How are ORA-1s being audited?

From: Rich Jesse <rjoralist2_at_society.servebeer.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:43:18 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <e2d547a7bf7ab1bcb33c7586fe8c4034.squirrel_at_society.servebeer.com>

Freek D'Hooge writes:

> Instead of using auditing, I would have a look at the "after servererror"
> trigger.

Thanks for the idea, but right now I'm more concerned with how the ORA-1s are currently audited. As I'm prepping for a 11.2 upgrade, unknown things in my databases make me nervous, as I'm unable to plan for them.

Rich

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Mar 08 2011 - 11:43:18 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: kathy duret: "Re: Process and sessions overhead"
Previous message: CRISLER, JON A (ATTCORP): "RE: Process and sessions overhead"
Maybe in reply to: Rich Jesse: "How are ORA-1s being audited?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message