Re: Process and sessions overhead

From: Paul Drake <bdbafh_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:09:43 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikJsKCN_Tn9HXOeKa6BBktit6JVt2WswESLz5L7_at_mail.gmail.com>



Niall,

How long has it been since you've had to use orastack.exe to reduce the process memory allocated to each session? I think that the last time that I ran it was against Oracle 8.1.7.4.6 (on x86 MS Win).

Paul

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Niall Litchfield < niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Windows 1000m! I don't have other o/s details in my brain. Also consider
> if hugepages is in use or not
>
> On 8 Mar 2011 16:50, "CRISLER, JON A (ATTCORP)" <JC1706_at_att.com> wrote:
>
> What is the memory overhead of increasing processes and sessions ? Say I
> current have 1000 sessions and I want to increase that to 2000 sessions: how
> much extra memory would I use assuming no additional processes sessions are
> really used ?
>
>
>
> I used to recall in Oracle 7/8 days that it was a trivial amount- like 8
> bytes, or 80 bytes, or something small. But I am not sure I am remembering
> correctly….
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Mar 08 2011 - 11:09:43 CST

Original text of this message