Re: Mutliplexing control/redo files
From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:47:26 +1100
Message-ID: <4D3F6F1E.2020603_at_iinet.net.au>
Same here. And the FRA is in yet another LUN. That way I can be saving the archived redo logs in the FRA at the same time redo is being acted upon and copied to archive, with very little overhead.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:47:26 +1100
Message-ID: <4D3F6F1E.2020603_at_iinet.net.au>
Same here. And the FRA is in yet another LUN. That way I can be saving the archived redo logs in the FRA at the same time redo is being acted upon and copied to archive, with very little overhead.
-- Cheers Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia dbvision_at_iinet.net.au Yechiel Adar wrote,on my timestamp of 25/01/2011 10:54 PM:Received on Tue Jan 25 2011 - 18:47:26 CST
> There was one point I did not see in the thread.
> I use separate mount point for:
> 1) Redo - our San administrator put redo on fast (and costly) disks.
> 2) Archive - For two reasons:
> A - I do not care for the archives to fill up the database disk.
> B - Cheaper disks as this is only write once, read once.
>
> Yechiel Adar
> Israel
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l