Re: Update not behaving as hoped

From: Jack van Zanen <jack_at_vanzanen.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:35:06 +1100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=FXfFaRvw388EFt-DUaq8f5dX50cww2uXbf5AM_at_mail.gmail.com>



try running the subselect on it's own

table2 has NO column named code.

Jack van Zanen



This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Mindaugas Navickas <mnavickas_at_yahoo.com>wrote:

> Jack,
>
> I might not be as "smart" as Oracle and SQL servers together, but I can not
> see that syntax error as you see it. To it looks "normal" that sub-select
> has some columns from outer statement - for example - would you consider
> this update "normal":
>
>
> update table1
> set Org=0
> where exists (select 1 from table2 where code=per_code);
>
>
>
> As well as this (which would be equivelent to one that you have send)
>
>
> update table1
> set Org=0
> where exists (select 1 from table2 where code=code);
>
>
> Regards
> Mike Navickas
> Oracle&DB2 DBA
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jack van Zanen <jack_at_vanzanen.com>
> *To:* oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Sent:* Tue, November 2, 2010 9:10:40 PM
> *Subject:* Update not behaving as hoped
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> Oracle 11 / Sql Server (same behaviour)
>
> My wife encountered following issue on sql server and asked me to check if
> oracle was "smarter". It seems to not be.
>
>
> Test case:
>
>
>
> create
> table table1
> (code int,Org int,Descr varchar(20));
>
> create
> table table2
> (per_code int,Name varchar(20));
>
> insert
> into table1 values (1,100,'Rec1');
>
> insert
> into table1 values (2,200,'Rec2');
>
> insert
> into table1 values (3,300,'Rec3');
>
> insert
> into table2 values (1,'TestRec1');
>
> insert
> into table2 values (2,'TestRec2');
>
> update
> table1
> set Org=0
> where code in (select code from table2); --There is a syntax error
> "invalid identifier" in the subselect but there is no error when running
> this update.
>
> select
> * from table1; --Not only was there no error but it updated the entire
> table.
>
>
> This is probably "normal" behaviour since both oracle and sql server do it
> but I would have hoped that a syntax error would result in an error no
> matter where it happens. Can anybody explain the technical reason why this
> would be happening.
>
> Jack
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Nov 02 2010 - 21:35:06 CDT

Original text of this message