Re: 11g RedHat 5 and Hugepages

From: <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:03:27 +0800
Message-Id: <31835.1287025407_at_iinet.net.au>



Completely in agreement.
Thanks, Kevin.
Cheers
Nuno
On Wed Oct
 13 22:56 , Kevin Closson sent:

>Nothing wrong with this feedback because it includes information about how to do
it right (e.g., pooled connections). But therein lies my point. Take you 1GB SGA and attach a couple hundred dedicated connection and you'll wish you'd have either a) used huge pages or b) reduced your dedicated connection count. I wrote:
>
>"Any system with large connection count is not going to be able to afford the
wasted page table memory."
>
>So, while this is a good follow up it isn't disagreeing at all with what I am said.
>
>Oh, by the way, why on earth would anyone still be using a 32-bit OS? That is a
larger question.
>
>In summary, if you don't like the size of the page tables do something about it.
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 22:03:27 CDT

Original text of this message