Re: 32bit oracle on 64bit OS

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinjGG9CxrlLVwFo8xlbo_XM7Msgx5-aFd1-it8m_at_mail.gmail.com>

I certainly have *seen* 9.2.0.8 on 64bit windows - I can't recall how the client got there. I saw it in the context of moving the database to 64bit, with much joy all around since this environment really pushed the 32bit envelope due to the number of concurrent connections. Is there a reason that you need to stay with 9.2.0.8?

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Storey, Robert (DCSO) < RStorey_at_dcso.nashville.org> wrote:

> Anyone out there done a Windows OS upgrade from 32 to 64 bit with a 32bit
> oracle version on it?
>
>
>
> We’ve got a new 64bit server that we migrated our 32bit OS and 32bit Oracle
> (9i 9.2.0.8) onto it and it seems to work fine. However, we now want to
> migrate the OS on the box to 64bit.
>
>
>
> Looking at note 834829.1, it states that 64bit hardware with 64 bit os and
> 32bit rdbms is not certified. Didn’t say it wasn’t possible, just not
> certified.
>
>
>
> Anyone out there running in this type of setup?
>
>
>
> I am working on migrating the Oracle to 54 bit, but it means an version
> upgrade to 10g since it appears that 9i does not have a 64 bit version and
> is basically desupported.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Jul 15 2010 - 01:01:41 CDT