Re: cost of autoextend

From: De DBA <dedba_at_tpg.com.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:05:25 +1000
Message-ID: <4B9D6BB5.6020408_at_tpg.com.au>



If you limit the max file size, don't you have the same situation as when you don't enable "set & forget"? But then, when the disk/LUN/etc fills up you'll still have to swing into action..

An adequate DBA monitors tablespace usage, so the answer to the question would be "in DBA salaries"... ;)

Auto-extend is just a feel-good marketing tool, imho.

Cheers,
Tony

On 14/03/10 10:50 AM, Michael Dinh wrote:
> Even with autoextend, you can control the max file size.
>
> The question is, how do you measure the cost of a failing process
> because of inadequate storage?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Joe Smith
> Sent: Sat 3/13/2010 11:38 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: cost of autoextend
>
>
> How do you measure the cost of a datafile autoextending?
>
>
>
> thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850553/direct/01/
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Mar 14 2010 - 18:05:25 CDT

Original text of this message