RE: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?

From: Warren Puziewicz <warren.puziewicz_at_realtimeworlds.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:58 +0000
Message-ID: <B0078105498B4A4E99D4908A84AB096BCB43244C10_at_RTW-UK-MX01.realtimeworlds.com>

With all the anti-RAC sentiments being expressed in this thread, I have a question:

If not RAC, then what does everyone recommend in its place? A single SMP server would certainly be easier to administer, but then you're into forklift upgrades when you outgrow it.

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com Sent: 22 February 2010 12:52
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?

I'm being pulled into a meeting later this morning to answer why we shouldn't put every db in RAC? Any white papers etc, stating why its a bad idea?

thanks, joe

---

Joe Testa, Oracle Certified Professional Senior Engineering & Administration Lead
(Work) 614-677-1668
(Cell) 614-312-6715

Interested in helping out your marriage? Ask me about "Weekend to Remember"

---

This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System

---

DISCLAIMER This message and any attachments contain privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. Please note that we cannot guarantee that this message or any attachment is virus free or that it has not been intercepted and amended. The views of the author may not necessarily reflect those of Realtime Worlds Ltd.  

Realtime Worlds Ltd is registered in Scotland, number 225628. Registered Office: 152 West Marketgait, Dundee, DD1 1NJ.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Feb 23 2010 - 05:16:58 CST