Re: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?

From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:30:47 -0200
Message-ID: <172762181002220730q102ce479jb0f89e8fcfabcacf_at_mail.gmail.com>



Just make sure you don't end up having to manage 50 pointless RACs... ;) Alan.-

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Goulet, Richard <Richard.Goulet_at_parexel.com
> wrote:

> Hemant,
>
> That is quite true, but once you've voiced your concerns and
> objections (as someone else recently pointed out) your off the hook.
>
>
> Dick Goulet
> Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
> PAREXEL International
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemant K Chitale [mailto:hkchital_at_singnet.com.sg]
> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:51 AM
> To: Goulet, Richard
> Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: Documentation for reasons to NOT use RAC?
>
>
>
> Sometimes being politically correct can mean being professionally
> lacking. Lacking in management's duty to protecting shareholders (or
> citizen's) money.
>
> At 10:35 PM Monday, Goulet, Richard wrote:
> > Maybe the best argument for RAC is politics. .... It just makes
> > your boss feel more secure.
> >
> >
> >Dick Goulet
> >Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
> >PAREXEL International
> >
>
>
> Hemant K Chitale
>
> http://hemantoracledba.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Feb 22 2010 - 09:30:47 CST

Original text of this message