RE: Oracle Vulnerable
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:15:55 -0600
Java's not at fault. The problem was "due to the way Java has been implemented"
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Guillermo Alan Bort Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:34 PM To: jkstill_at_gmail.com
Cc: ian_at_slac.stanford.edu; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Oracle Vulnerable
Of course... Java is at fault... I wonder why people still us it.... Alan.-
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
This hasn't appeared on the BugTraq or FullDisclosure lists, so I would
suspect there is no publicly available information on it.
Jared Still Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist Oracle Blog: http://jkstill.blogspot.com Home Page: http://jaredstill.com On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:05 AM, MacGregor, Ian A.<ian_at_slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
Does anyone know which publicly granted objects allow this?Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 16:15:55 CST