RE: Oracle Vulnerable

From: Blanchard, William <wblanchard_at_societyinsurance.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:15:55 -0600
Message-ID: <CB340D772D072D47A5DE07533432A7E50E68BEA7_at_exch1.soc.int>

Java's not at fault. The problem was "due to the way Java has been implemented"    

WGB

---

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Guillermo Alan Bort Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:34 PM To: jkstill_at_gmail.com
Cc: ian_at_slac.stanford.edu; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Oracle Vulnerable

Of course... Java is at fault... I wonder why people still us it.... Alan.-

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:

        This hasn't appeared on the BugTraq or FullDisclosure lists, so I would

        suspect there is no publicly available information on it.

	Jared Still
	Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
	Oracle Blog: http://jkstill.blogspot.com
	Home Page: http://jaredstill.com
	
	
	
	
	On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:05 AM, MacGregor, Ian A.

<ian_at_slac.stanford.edu> wrote:                  

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/020310-black-hat-zero-day-hack-ora cle.html?source=NWWNLE_nlt_security_2010-02-04                 

                Does anyone know which publicly granted objects allow this?                 

		--
		http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
		
		
		

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Feb 04 2010 - 16:15:55 CST