Re: Oracle RAC Server Conf.
From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:12:36 +0100
Message-Id: <E6B0837F-BD5E-48D2-9ED2-AF37F2311F12_at_gmail.com>
Alan,
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:12:36 +0100
Message-Id: <E6B0837F-BD5E-48D2-9ED2-AF37F2311F12_at_gmail.com>
Alan,
Can you please specify the massive cluster overhead?
In cache fusion, every time only up to 3 instances are involved, at
least for often touched blocks.
(I currently doesn't know how the 'master' of an object is communicated)
So if the interconnect-switch is designed well, it will scale.
Martin
Am 23.01.2010 um 22:59 schrieb Guillermo Alan Bort:
> Actually, a 100node RAC would have a massive overhead in cluster
> administration and would almost certainly be slower than a smaller
> RAC environment...
>
> On the other hand... it might be faster than VMWare ;-)
> Alan.-
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun Jan 24 2010 - 15:12:36 CST