Re: db_recovery_dest pointing to 100Tb file system

From: hrishy <hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:49:16 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <913692.7122.qm_at_web23703.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Hi Howard
 

Thank you very much i appreciate the quick response.
 

regards

• On Fri, 15/1/10, Howard Latham <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> wrote:

From: Howard Latham <howard.latham_at_gmail.com> Subject: Re: db_recovery_dest pointing to 100Tb file system To: hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Date: Friday, 15 January, 2010, 14:47

Shortest Reply ever! 1 is best because you know always know where it is going and no config changes will be required. - The only only downside is if the recovery area goes off  line. If you only have 1 then you have a singe point of failure - bit of a no no.But I if you have space on your server for a temporary area in case of failure then I would still go for 1 Very big recovery area.  

2010/1/15 Howard Latham <howard.latham_at_gmail.com>

1

2010/1/15 hrishy <hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk>

Hi
 

I have a 25TB database for which i need to configure a recoery area. is it advisable to configure a single filesystem of 100Tb as recovery area or configure 5-8 filesystems adding to 100Tb .
 
 

-- 
Howard A. Latham





-- 
Howard A. Latham





      
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Fri Jan 15 2010 - 08:49:16 CST