Re: Document 465968.1
From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:20:06 +0100
Message-Id: <FFFBC54F-91ED-407E-A96F-1A3C447969DF_at_gmail.com>
Kurts explanations remembered me of the way, many oracle documents are seperated into public and internal parts: In many documents, lines starting with a _at_ are shown only 'internal'. If my memory serves well, this goes back to the old TAR-handling forms- application.
maybe you want to ask the support analyst if this can be the case in Doc:465968.1 too.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:20:06 +0100
Message-Id: <FFFBC54F-91ED-407E-A96F-1A3C447969DF_at_gmail.com>
Kurts explanations remembered me of the way, many oracle documents are seperated into public and internal parts: In many documents, lines starting with a _at_ are shown only 'internal'. If my memory serves well, this goes back to the old TAR-handling forms- application.
maybe you want to ask the support analyst if this can be the case in Doc:465968.1 too.
br
Martin
>
> Take this information with the grain of salt that any recommendation
> on a public mailing list should be taken with.
>
> When I look on support.oracle.com, I see the name of the .sql
> scripts is missing for those steps.
>
> When I look at support.us.oracle.com (an internal Oracle site), I
> see for step 11, substep 4:
>
> sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
> _at_wdbigra.sql portal
> For step 11, substep 7, I see:
>
> cd $OH/rdbms/admin
> sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
> _at_utlrp
>
> As others already have surmised.
>
> I hope this helps.
> Kurt
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Dec 29 2009 - 02:20:06 CST