Re: Document 465968.1
From: S. Anthony Sequeira <tony_at_sequeira.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:44:54 +0000
Message-ID: <4B33A896.8070809_at_sequeira.org.uk>
Rich Tylka wrote:
> Can someone please confirm to me whether I'm going crazy or not by
> looking at document 465968.1, step 11, substeps 4 and 7, and see if it
> looks like Oracle left out exactly what sql script to run in those
> steps? I opened an SR about it but they're saying the document is
> fine. I looked at it in IE and Firefox with the same results.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Rich
If you're crazy, then so am I.
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:44:54 +0000
Message-ID: <4B33A896.8070809_at_sequeira.org.uk>
Rich Tylka wrote:
> Can someone please confirm to me whether I'm going crazy or not by
> looking at document 465968.1, step 11, substeps 4 and 7, and see if it
> looks like Oracle left out exactly what sql script to run in those
> steps? I opened an SR about it but they're saying the document is
> fine. I looked at it in IE and Firefox with the same results.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Rich
If you're crazy, then so am I.
The second one should be the standard recompile script, can't recall what it's name is at present.
-- S. Anthony Sequeira ++ A shapely CATHOLIC SCHOOLGIRL is FIDGETING inside my costume.. ++ -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Dec 24 2009 - 11:44:54 CST