Re: Bit OT : diff bet'n business continuity and high availability

From: Steve Baldwin <stbaldwin_at_multiservice.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:39:07 +1100
Message-ID: <d282b3ab0912240339vd8a0721s1697f1441575c325_at_mail.gmail.com>

I wonder if HAS is more focussed on local hardware failure/failover (e.g. RAC) whereas BCS is more geared towards total catastrophic failure - e.g. tornado levelling data center.

Steve

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:57 PM, _JP_ <premj_at_rediffmail.com> wrote:

> List,
>
> (Sorry for this bit OT discussion. Would stop such posts
> in future ... if it is not acceptable on this list)
>
> I was asked (in an interview sometime back): about the difference
> bet'n high availability solution and business continuity solution.
>
> For me - both sound similar except - BCS is from business
> perspective and HAS is from technical perspective.
>
> Is that right ? How would you guys have handled this question ?
>
> Thoughts ?!!
>
> ~ jp ~
>
> <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm_at_Middle?>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu Dec 24 2009 - 05:39:07 CST