Re: active-active for private IP?
From: J Buchanan <oracle_at_digistar.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:02:25 -0500
Message-Id: <6951CC88-523F-4BDB-9EF6-E29E387F0214_at_digistar.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:02:25 -0500
Message-Id: <6951CC88-523F-4BDB-9EF6-E29E387F0214_at_digistar.com>
On Dec 1, 2009, at 8:45 AM, Herring Dave - dherri wrote:
> No one has official recommendations
> from Oracle, so the choice is back to which is more important -
> potential performance gains vs. redundancy.
I have an SR open regarding this very issue - Oracle support recommends the use of bonded interfaces for the interconnect.-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Tue Dec 01 2009 - 08:02:25 CST