Re: Duplicate function is a lot longer than a backup
From: Marcin Przepiorowski <pioro1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:01:22 +0000
Message-ID: <3f5690af0912010601w11b38bbeic1adaf43d35ef764_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Jeffrey Beckstrom <JBECKSTROM_at_gcrta.org> wrote:
> No RAID 5 in use.
>
> The target server houses all of our non-production databases which are
> mostly idle.
>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:01:22 +0000
Message-ID: <3f5690af0912010601w11b38bbeic1adaf43d35ef764_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Jeffrey Beckstrom <JBECKSTROM_at_gcrta.org> wrote:
> No RAID 5 in use.
>
> The target server houses all of our non-production databases which are
> mostly idle.
>
Did you compare a disk utilization between backup and restore process ?
Is it using all possible throughput during restore ?
You can compare a restore process with backup copy operation between
servers (this depend on network throughput too) but all of these
activities can give you a answer if
slow saving is only during database restore - if yes you have problem
with Oracle, if no - check a OS first - maybe some of disks in your
storage has physical problems.
regards,
Marcin Przepiorowski
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Dec 01 2009 - 08:01:22 CST