Re: Upgrades with no downtime
From: Kerry Osborne <kerry.osborne_at_enkitec.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:45:22 -0500
Message-Id: <0B916757-F03E-4941-A6E8-60157C5A6AF9_at_enkitec.com>
I think the whole idea is to have views, which are editionable (if that's a word), sitting on top of the tables. So the apps would access the views instead of the base tables. I think this is similar to you're original idea. This looks to be a very workable approach.
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:45:22 -0500
Message-Id: <0B916757-F03E-4941-A6E8-60157C5A6AF9_at_enkitec.com>
I think the whole idea is to have views, which are editionable (if that's a word), sitting on top of the tables. So the apps would access the views instead of the base tables. I think this is similar to you're original idea. This looks to be a very workable approach.
Kerry Osborne
Enkitec
blog: kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com
On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Johan Eriksson wrote:
> On the other hand, since tables are noneditioned type in this version
> perhaps we can't use this since we want to be able to make changes on
> tables as well
>
> /johan
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Johan Eriksson <valpis_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This seems like what we want, and since we running 11R1 and planning
>> on upgrade soon I will check out this feature. So big thanks on the
>> link!
>>
>> /johan
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Oct 27 2009 - 12:45:22 CDT