RE: tnsManager Vs OID

From: Goulet, Richard <Richard.Goulet_at_parexel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:43:56 -0400
Message-ID: <6B0D50B70F12BD41B5A67F14F5AA887F0188F657_at_us-bos-mx022.na.pxl.int>

They did, it was called ONames till some BOZO convinced them that LDAP was the future.  

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International  

---

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of ~Jeff~ Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 3:52 AM
To: sundarmahadevan82_at_gmail.com; Oracle-L_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: tnsManager Vs OID

tnsManager just uses a tnsnames.ora file , no database required.

Its a shame Oracle didn't make OID so elegantly simple!

2009/10/25 sundar mahadevan <sundarmahadevan82_at_gmail.com>

        From Alan's reply, Am I correct in understanding that OID requires an

        oracle database for names resolution. But with respect to tnsManager,

        I do not think it requires a database.         

	On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Guillermo Alan Bort
	<cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com> wrote:


	> Plus you get the basic memory footprint of an Oracle

Database... I don't


	> reckon you will need much memory... but at least 200MB...

	>

	> cheers.

	> Alan Bort

	> Oracle Certified Professional

	
	--
	http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
	
	
	

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sun Oct 25 2009 - 07:43:56 CDT