Re: Hetergenous Dataguard
From: Sanjay Mishra <smishra_97_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <912610.9884.qm_at_web51310.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <912610.9884.qm_at_web51310.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Don Yes I had checked your Blog and in my case it is Sparc but Thanks for the excillent info on the blog. Sanjay ________________________________ From: Justin Cave (DDBC) <jcave_at_ddbcinc.com> To: Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us>; Sanjay Mishra <smishra_97_at_yahoo.com>; "Freek.DHooge@uptime.be" <Freek.DHooge@uptime.be>; "oracle-l@freelists.org" <oracle-l@freelists.org> Sent: Wed, October 21, 2009 8:53:17 PM Subject: RE: Hetergenous Dataguard Excellent point. I assumed since one of the source databases was AIX that the Solaris machine would be SPARC, but I should have noted that assumption. As far as I'm aware, the AIX to linux restore is not possible in 10g though. Justin Cave Distributed Database Consulting, Inc. http://www.ddbcinc.com -----Original Message----- From: Don Seiler [mailto:don_at_seiler.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:14 PM To: Justin Cave (DDBC); Sanjay Mishra; Freek.DHooge_at_uptime.be; oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Re: Hetergenous Dataguard I have in fact done two such restores. Both times doing a restore on linux from solaris. Both are x86-64. I have a blog post about it as well on http://www.pythian.com. Oracle does support this as long as both architectures are the same and a convert is done on any tablespaces containing UNDO segments. If you meant Solaris SPARC, then yes, it woudn't work. Don. On 10/21/09, Justin Cave (DDBC) <jcave_at_ddbcinc.com> wrote: > That does not sound realisitic. > > A backup taken on a Solaris machine cannot be restored to a Linux server in > 10g. Neither can a backup taken from an AIX machine be restored to a Linux > server in 10g. Starting in 11.1, cross-platform transportable database > functionality might allow you to do this, but that would only be on the full > backup and restore, not on the incremental. You may be able to use > transportable tablespaces in 10g to do the initial copy as well. > > Streams or Oracle Golden Gate would seem like a far more realistic option if > you need to create a reporting replica in a different geographic region. > This would not (without some potentially significant work) allow you to fail > over to the replica, but I am hoping that is not your intention at this > point. > > > Justin Cave > Distributed Database Consulting, Inc. > http://www.ddbcinc.com > > > > From: Sanjay Mishra [mailto:smishra_97_at_yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 10:27 AM > To: Freek.DHooge_at_uptime.be; Justin Cave (DDBC); oracle-l@freelists.org > Subject: Re: Hetergenous Dataguard > > Thank s for the information on the Streams. Actually the reason for Datguard > or other setup is to move the part of the Database to another Geographical > location. There is not big bandwidth available available between two > location and so cannot take the backup and copy it to other location and > make the cutover as Database is around 500G. There is not much changes on > the Primary Site. > > Can I get an update if this process is feasible for the above scenarios > 1. Take the Database level 0 backup on Solaris/Aix - There are two > environment which need to be moved where one is AIX and other Solaris. > Target is Linux > 2. Take the Increamental and copy it to target location. On the final date, > Step 1 Level 0 backup will be restored and incremental one will be applied > > Issue is that if I can continue two backup on the Production like one Full > going daily and another above incremental. Is it possible to be done both > recorded in Controlfile or we need to change the backup process to one of > them only. > > TIA > Sanjay > ________________________________ > From: D'Hooge Freek <Freek.DHooge_at_uptime.be> > To: "jcave_at_ddbcinc.com" <jcave@ddbcinc.com>; "smishra_97@yahoo.com" > <smishra_97_at_yahoo.com>; "oracle-l@freelists.org" <oracle-l@freelists.org> > Sent: Tue, October 20, 2009 6:22:32 PM > Subject: RE: Hetergenous Dataguard > > Interesting note, although the options seems to be limited > I thought that the platform always had to be the same. > > Learned something new again today :) > > > > Regards, > > > Freek D'Hooge > Uptime > Oracle Database Administrator > email: freek.dhooge_at_uptime.be<mailto:freek.dhooge@uptime.be> > tel +32(0)3 451 23 82 > http://www.uptime.be > > ________________________________________ > From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org> > [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>] > On Behalf Of Justin Cave (DDBC) > Sent: woensdag 21 oktober 2009 0:05 > To: smishra_97_at_yahoo.com<mailto:smishra_97@yahoo.com>; > oracle-l_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org> > Subject: RE: Hetergenous Dataguard > > I believe Metalink Doc ID 413484.1 Data Guard Support for Heterogeneous > Primary and Standby Systems in the Same Data Guard Configuration is the > canonical reference for what configurations are allowed depending on the > Oracle version. > > Unfortunately, an AIX primary is only compatible with an AIX standby. On > the other hand, a Linux x86 box can have a Windows standby database. > > > Justin Cave > Distributed Database Consulting, Inc. > http://www.ddbcinc.com > > -- > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.21/2445 - Release Date: 10/19/09 > 06:40:00 > -- Don Seiler http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com ultimate: http://www.mufc.us No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.422 / Virus Database: 270.14.21/2445 - Release Date: 10/19/09 06:40:00 -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Oct 23 2009 - 15:43:46 CDT