RE: 11g R2 Feedback?
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <4814386347E41145AAE79139EAA398980D2E2395E8_at_ws03-exch07.iconos.be>
Niall,
During some licensing training I got from oracle, it was stated that the custom install is always an enterprise install. Even if you don't select any of the enterprise options.
Regards,
Freek D'Hooge
Uptime
Oracle Database Administrator
email: freek.dhooge_at_uptime.be
tel +32(0)3 451 23 82
http://www.uptime.be
disclaimer
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Niall Litchfield Sent: donderdag 22 oktober 2009 17:28
To: development_at_the-playground.de
Cc: jifjif_at_gmail.com; kjped1313_at_yahoo.com; Oracle-L_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: 11g R2 Feedback?
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Martin Bach <development_at_the-playground.de> wrote: Hi group,
my experience with 11g is a mixed bag.
Installed 11.1.0.6 at a customer site as a demo on T1000/Solaris 10 and ran into problem when I showed them how to apply a patchset (11.1.0.7): the SE installation became EE with all features on. Wonder if the next release then phones home?
Oracle has a history of doing that - assuming you are checking via the banner - You also can't do a custom SE install on at least some versions, it then gets reported as EE via v$version. DBA_REGISTRY seems to be reliable though for installed features at least though I'd like it to list features and options (yes I know about v$option) so that people knew what they had installed. Still one windows patch supplied a debug dll for distributed transactions that then stopped TPMs working at all!
-- Martin Bach OCM 10g http://martincarstenbach.wordpress.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Oct 22 2009 - 11:15:16 CDT