Re: RHEL5 x86-64 - Oracle92040

From: Scott Sibert <ssibert_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:23:36 -0500
Message-ID: <9a600bbf0910211323m68a20e6fv5a7bf01cb3f2e9d1_at_mail.gmail.com>

I know someone here (at my work) tried to install 9.2.0.6 on RHEL5 (32-bit or 64-bit) and was unsuccessful. (We have it running on RHEL4.) At one point we were concerned that when we upgrade some 9206 stuff to 11g that we'd still have one app on 9 but it has been upgraded so we can move it to at least 10g, possibly 11g so we're not concerned about getting 9 running on RHEL5. --Scott

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> My notes say to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 for RH 4 X86-64.If not set,
> the symptoms you describe occur.
>
> No help I know, but it does confirm that you set it properly
> for previous linux versions.
>
> There is no mention (that I could find) on puschitz.com,
> so it may just be that 9i cannot be installed on AS 5.
>
> ML Notes 360142.1 and 377217.1
>
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
> Oracle Blog: http://jkstill.blogspot.com
> Home Page: http://jaredstill.com
>
>
>
> 2009/10/21 Toth, Istvan 5 (GE Capital) <istvan5.toth_at_ge.com>
>
> Hello list,
>>
>> This combination (RHEL5 x86-64 and Oracle 9.2.0.4.0) is not oracle
>> certified but i have to install for test purposes. The installer hangs when
>> tries to link 'naeet.o'. I found a metalink note (360142.1) with the same
>> situation - but it's about Linux x86, my server is 64bit - and it says
>> that have to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL parameter. Another note says (377217.1)
>> that the recommended settings for RHEL5 is "should not be set". So what?
>> Anyway, I tried to run the installer with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 and
>> 2.4.21 and 2.6.9 and without any setting, but I get the same hang at
>> 'naeet.o'.
>> Anybody with any experience with this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Istvan
>>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Oct 21 2009 - 15:23:36 CDT