Antwort: OCFS2 vs Oracle ASM CFS
From: Martin Klier <Martin.Klier_at_klug-is.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:55:58 +0200
Message-ID: <OF29D7EF24.2581F83A-ONC1257627.0051AF1D-C1257627.0052073A_at_klug-is.de>
I have been under the impression that OCFS2 was considered as secondary by Oracle a year or 1 1/2 years ago. Other possibility, it was considered as "ready", and no need for further working on it. But I must confess, since Frank Seiwerth left (or something similar) OCFS2 for going to Microsoft, I have not heard much news about it.
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:55:58 +0200
Message-ID: <OF29D7EF24.2581F83A-ONC1257627.0051AF1D-C1257627.0052073A_at_klug-is.de>
I have been under the impression that OCFS2 was considered as secondary by Oracle a year or 1 1/2 years ago. Other possibility, it was considered as "ready", and no need for further working on it. But I must confess, since Frank Seiwerth left (or something similar) OCFS2 for going to Microsoft, I have not heard much news about it.
May be a personal impression, but ...
Regards
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Martin Klier
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Sep 04 2009 - 09:55:58 CDT