Re: Question about patch levels

From: Ganesh Raja <ganesh.raja_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:34:26 +0000
Message-ID: 787604458-1251272079-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-147977138-_at_bda113.bisx.produk.on.blackberry>



Multiple database applications which don't want to upgrade. A seperate home will help.

Cheers.
------Original Message------
From: Yechiel Adar
Sender: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
Cc: Oracle L
ReplyTo: adar666_at_inter.net.il
Subject: Re: Question about patch levels Sent: Aug 26, 2009 12:58

You are right in principle.
However, he used windows '\' rather then Linux '/' in the directory list so I assumed Windows.
We generally use only one database per windows server. Add to that the fact that he uses separate home for each CPU, so my question is relevant.

Maybe it needed to be: Why use a separate home for each patch level?

Adar Yechiel
Rechovot, Israel

Niall Litchfield wrote:
> I can't speak for Charles, but sometimes this is a sensible idea in
> the event of wishing to roll back an upgrade, or more generally when
> you have multiple database applications on the same server, then the
> slowest/most difficult to update doesn't hold everyone back. .
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel†Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+ƒün– {ú+iÉ^ Received on Wed Aug 26 2009 - 02:34:26 CDT

Original text of this message