RE: OID and tnsnames.ora
From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:13:40 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E11293D9E2E_at_ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
I second that - we used Oracle Names Server (I think that's what you meant by "SQL Names") for a long time and were very happy with it until we upgraded to 10g and I actually went back to tnsnames.ora files rather than implement OID.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:13:40 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E11293D9E2E_at_ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
I second that - we used Oracle Names Server (I think that's what you meant by "SQL Names") for a long time and were very happy with it until we upgraded to 10g and I actually went back to tnsnames.ora files rather than implement OID.
I don't know why Oracle got rid of the Names Server - it seemed like such a solid, simple and useful application.
Regards,
Brandon
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jared Still
I still prefer SQL Names, too bad Oracle did away with it.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 15:13:40 CDT