RE: Ghost Data
From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E1128D50B95_at_ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
Hi Bob, I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're saying, but I duplicated this on both 8i and 10g databases and IIRC, there weren't multiple block sizes back in 8i and if there were, we weren't using them in either of the databases I tested in.
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E1128D50B95_at_ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
Hi Bob, I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're saying, but I duplicated this on both 8i and 10g databases and IIRC, there weren't multiple block sizes back in 8i and if there were, we weren't using them in either of the databases I tested in.
Regards,
Brandon
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Stauffer, Robert G
Also, could the issue be contributed to allowing different block sizes in different tablespaces? Might the code try to save time by writing the whole block to the tablespace if there is enough free space?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 01 2009 - 12:06:36 CDT