Re: impdp performance
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:18:02 -0500
Thanks Yechiel, That is what I did last time. I wanted to check if there was something new.
It was not a little edit though. It was not just search and replace. The index definitions of some indexes had parallel already built in them, which caused them to fail after I added my own parallel clause. I guess I will do it that way.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Yechiel Adar <adar666_at_inter.net.il> wrote:
> You can use impdp with:
> to get the sql to create all the indexes.
> A little edit will make all the create index no logging and parallel ans
> You get additional bonus as you can then split the index creation to 3-4
> parts and run them in parallel.
> Adar Yechiel
> Rechovot, Israel
> Ram Raman wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> We have about 50,000 indexes in this schema. If I exclude indexes during
>> import and decide to create them later using Nologging and parallel options,
>> do I need to extract the index DDLs for each of the indexes and modify the
>> DDL for each of them or is there any quick way to set it for all indexes. v
>> 10g. I used a parallelism of 8.