Re: Location of ASM spfiles in RAC

From: LS Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:16:09 +0200
Message-ID: <6e9345580906180816q2a7cde16gcc8899b0607eea3f_at_mail.gmail.com>



ops missread

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Randy Johnson <oraclelist_at_sbcglobal.net>wrote:

> Jason is correct. Itís a chicken and egg thing. I always go with local
> init.ora file. Just personal preference. I guess the main reason is
> simplicity. I don't need NFS for anything else so why would I add the
> complexity/liability of a shared file system into my architecture when the
> ASM parameters are usually "set it and forget it". You rarely have to
> change
> the ASM parameters after you get your system setup.
>
> -Randy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of jason arneil
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:38 AM
> To: exriscer_at_gmail.com
> Cc: veeeraman_at_gmail.com; ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Location of ASM spfiles in RAC
>
> Hello,
>
> You can't store the ASM spfile in ASM.
>
> Agreed never local, I'm using raw device.
>
> jason
> --
> http://jarneil.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> 2009/6/18 LS Cheng <exriscer_at_gmail.com>:
> > Hi
> >
> > Usually I stored inside ASM but a couple of times I used raw devices for
> > that. Never local though (no point)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > LSC
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Ram Raman <veeeraman_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Listers,
> >>
> >> What do you normally use as the location of ASM's spfile in a RAC
> >> database. I have to decide between spfiles local to each node vs a
> shared
> >> raw device. oracle 10g with ASM. OCR and VD in raw devices, no CFS.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 4167 (20090618) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 4167 (20090618) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 4167 (20090618) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 18 2009 - 10:16:09 CDT

Original text of this message