Re: RMAN conundrum
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:16:33 -0700
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Tony van Lingen < tony_vanlingen_at_technologyonecorp.com> wrote:
> I dont mean a syntax problem with the script as you gave it - I do
> appreciate that it is the same in both cases. However, it contains
> variables, Hence *at runtime* the scripts do differ.
> What I am thinking of is the resulting syntax after the two environment
> variables are evaluated. Presumably you either construct them earlier in the
> script or pipe them in somehow. If one of the variables has a value that
> disrupts the syntax at runtime, you could get the error that you are seeing.
> A statement like
> _at_echo [%FORMAT_PREFIX%] >> %RMAN_LOG_FILE%
> _at_echo [%FORMAT_SUFFIX%] >> %RMAN_LOG_FILE%
No, that wasn't it.
I did check all of these.
JaredReceived on Tue May 26 2009 - 19:16:33 CDT