Re: RMAN conundrum

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:16:33 -0700
Message-ID: <bf46380905261716r63e6fe41taf3dd8f5f8d801b9_at_mail.gmail.com>

Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Tony van Lingen < tony_vanlingen_at_technologyonecorp.com> wrote:

> Jared,
>
> I dont mean a syntax problem with the script as you gave it - I do
> appreciate that it is the same in both cases. However, it contains
> variables, Hence *at runtime* the scripts do differ.
>
> What I am thinking of is the resulting syntax after the two environment
> variables are evaluated. Presumably you either construct them earlier in the
> script or pipe them in somehow. If one of the variables has a value that
> disrupts the syntax at runtime, you could get the error that you are seeing.
> A statement like
>
> _at_echo [%FORMAT_PREFIX%] >> %RMAN_LOG_FILE%
> _at_echo [%FORMAT_SUFFIX%] >> %RMAN_LOG_FILE%
>
> ...
>

No, that wasn't it.

I did check all of these.

Jared

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue May 26 2009 - 19:16:33 CDT