RE: heavyweight OS monitoring as standard

From: Tanel Poder <tanel_at_poderc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:31:04 +0300
Message-ID: <9A4EB23DE0FF487DBA4932CB3D838B1B_at_porgand>



Hi Greg,

I may be missing something, but it looks like even collectl --all does not report the CPU runqueue lengths?!

That's the first thing I look at in vmstat when determining system health - I must be missing some option there, it's hard to believe that it's not reported at all?

--
Regards,
Tanel Poder
http://blog.tanelpoder.com
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Rahn
> Sent: 06 May 2009 07:29
> To: jeremy.schneider_at_ardentperf.com
> Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: heavyweight OS monitoring as standard
>
> I'm a huge fan of collectl for Linux, although I would not
> consider it heavy weight though it captures quite a bit of
> different system metrics.
> http://collectl.sourceforge.net
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed May 06 2009 - 06:31:04 CDT

Original text of this message