Re: 9.2 on RHEL5
From: Vishal Gupta <vishal_at_vishalgupta.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:39:47 +0100
Message-ID: <3CE18E99-5747-4AC2-AE92-1CFCDB7DE04D_at_vishalgupta.com>
I am fairly good in identifying the error from make logs and possibly finding some resolution of that on metalink. Bit this time I was totally umsuccessful with 9.2 on RHEL5. I am glad it's just not me. I can not go to oracle because 9.2 is in extended support their standard line us going to be install 10204 instead.
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:39:47 +0100
Message-ID: <3CE18E99-5747-4AC2-AE92-1CFCDB7DE04D_at_vishalgupta.com>
I am fairly good in identifying the error from make logs and possibly finding some resolution of that on metalink. Bit this time I was totally umsuccessful with 9.2 on RHEL5. I am glad it's just not me. I can not go to oracle because 9.2 is in extended support their standard line us going to be install 10204 instead.
Cheers,
Vishal Gupta
On 3 May 2009, at 18:23, "Jared Still" <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:52 AM, dba1 mcc <mccdba1_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> ORACLE 9iR2 can NOT work with REDHAt 5. If you really need ORACLE
> 9iR2 use REDHAT 4.X
>
> And even then it is a bit of a pain.
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sun May 03 2009 - 12:39:47 CDT