Re: Problem installing CRS using raw devise... 10.2 + sun solaris
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:26:59 -0300
Message-ID: <172762180904271526w7b826a7t49bef41d13b62bb2_at_mail.gmail.com>
you can have a symlink on one node for the correct network interface names (in /dev) I've done it a few years ago and it worked like a charm.
hth
Alan Bort
Oracle Certified Professional
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Pankaj Jain <pjain_at_ibasis.net> wrote:
> I want to bring to your notice one think which is unique in our case
> since the two servers that I are configuring for CRS/ASM/RAC using raw
> devices are DIFFERENT models, having same OS and because of that our
> interface name is different. both public and private. For your reference I
> am furnishing the output of uname -a from both servers and private and
> public interface names.
> racasm1>uname -a
> SunOS csgbur01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Netra-T5220
> racasm1>
>
> racasm2>uname -a
> SunOS dbmbur01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R
> racasm2>
> Interface names - Public
> ===================
> csgbur01- *e1000g0*
> dbmbur01- *ce0*
> **
> Interface names - Private
> ===================
> csgbur01- *e1000g2*
> dbmbur01- *ce2*
> **
> *Since the CRS installation needs two sets of ipaddresses one set for each
> server, as a workaround for this case, I have first installed CRS only on one
> node - csgbur01 and after it is done I have tried to add the node via addnode
> (2nd node - dbmbur01). **Since I can't use vipca because of different
> interface name, I am trying to configure the two nodes using oifcfg setif as
> follows and getting the below mentioned error. *
> ***racasm1>sudo oifcfg setif -node csgbur01 e1000g2/10.10.100.0:
> cluster_interconnect *
> ***racasm1>sudo oifcfg setif -node dbmbur01 ce2/10.10.100.0:
> cluster_interconnect
> **racasm1>sudo oifcfg setif -node csgbur01 e1000g0/216.168.188.0:public
> **racasm1>sudo oifcfg setif -node dbmbur01 ce0/216.168.188.0:public
> PROC-4: The cluster registry key to be operated on does not exist.
> PRIF-11: cluster registry error*
>
> *On discussing this issue with our Unix admin, following was his response.
> *
>
> *In looking at the csgbur01/dbmbur01 oracle asm cluster, the shared storage
> looks fine from dbmbur01, but it largely invisible from csgbur01. **I
> therefore suspect that clusterware on dbmbur01 has ejected csgbur01 from
> accessing the shared san storage. I googled a bit, but I don't know how to
> use oracle commands to query whether this is indeed the case. Let me know
> if you think this makes any sense, since I see no evidence of a san/storage
> issue.
> ***
>
> *FYI.. We have successfully setup our RAC environment using VERITAS
> cluster on the same two servers (csgbur01 and dbmbur01). **In the light of
> above facts please advice at your earliest convenience any solution if
> anybody might have.*
>
> *Thanks & regards,*
>
>
>
> *Pankaj Jain*
>
> 10 Second Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803
>
> Work (781) 505-7925 Cell (978) 987-0004 Fax (781) 505-7382*, *
>
> Email: pjain_at_ibasis.net ; 9789870004_at_vtext.com
>
> ***Confidentiality Statement : *This e-mail contains proprietary
> information of iBasis. It is exclusively intended for the recipient of this
> e-mail. The information should not be copied or distributed to third
> parties.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *A Ebadi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:55 PM
> *To:* oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* RAC - remove node
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone on this list had experience removing a node from an Oracle RAC
> cluster when that node is down/gone? In other words, does the node you are
> trying to remove have to be up for you to remove it?
>
> Background:
> We have a 6 node RAC cluster that we're having trouble removing nodes from
> and need some help. Nodes 1,2,5,6 are all still in the cluster and nodes
> 3,4 are partially in. We tried removing nodes 3,4 and were not able to due
> to issues with dbca hanging and other issues that followed. Any suggestions
> would be appreciated.
>
> We are on Oracle 10.2.3.0 w/ ASM on Solaris 10.
>
> Thanks,
> Abdul
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 17:26:59 CDT