Autoextend or not?

From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:33:03 -0300
Message-ID: <172762180904130233n3d6136bbxf9d0a4e5d66420d0_at_mail.gmail.com>

So,

We have a debate going on about allowing databases with datafiles with autoextend on... anybody has any input on this? any experience?

My side: I don't like autoextend, I can't trust the unix team to do their job and I can't allow for a datafile to fill up the FS. Then again, I can't trust monitoring tools to do their job, so autoextend *could* save the day.

thanks, and kind regards to all!
Alan Bort
Oracle Certified Professional

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Mon Apr 13 2009 - 04:33:03 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Guillermo Alan Bort: "Cold backup versus hot backup."
Previous message: kyle Hailey: "Re: "Practicing" Oracle performance tuning ..."
Next in thread: harshan eppuram: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Reply: harshan eppuram: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Reply: Jack van Zanen: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Maybe reply: TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Reply: Mark W. Farnham: "RE: Autoextend or not?"
Maybe reply: Nuno Souto: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Reply: Jared Still: "Re: Autoextend or not?"
Maybe reply: Jeffery Thomas: "Re: Autoextend or not?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message