Fwd: Mirroring redo log groups or not ?

From: Rich <richa03_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:27:43 -0700
Message-ID: <26279fb90904072227g344c08ddgd04d49a6a571e934_at_mail.gmail.com>



This should have been a "reply-all"
  • Forwarded message ---------- From: Rich <richa03_at_gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:25 PM Subject: Re: Mirroring redo log groups or not ? To: "Crisler, Jon" <Jon.Crisler_at_usi.com>

How much control do you have over the application and what it does? Can you "fix" the app to commit less or batch commits?

Failing that, I think RAID10 for the redo logs might be a decent fix at the database/storage level, however, be cognizant of recovery in the event of potential issues with non-grouped redo...

I would recommend separate redo LUNS - something like redoa1 & redoc2 on LUN1, redoa2 and redob1 on LUN2, redob2 and redoc1 on LUN3 with the letter being the group and and the number being the member. While I understand you may not have the LUNs to do that, seems it might be prudent.

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Crisler, Jon <Jon.Crisler_at_usi.com> wrote:

> Its one of the top issues measured in AWR / ADDM. The problem
> corresponds to poor response time for disk as measured at the host, and at
> the SAN level.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Rich [mailto:richa03_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:33 AM
> *To:* cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com
> *Cc:* mwf_at_rsiz.com; kennaim_at_gmail.com; david.barbour1_at_gmail.com; Crisler,
> Jon; Rajeev Prabhakar; Oracle-L Freelists
> *Subject:* Re: Mirroring redo log groups or not ?
>
>
>
> Back to the OP's question.
>
>
> I think you mean "log file sync", right?
>
> This means a session waits for LGWR to write redo to disk after commit or
> rollback.
> It is usually due to too many commits or short transactions; you should
> commit in batch or use faster redo log disk IO.
>
> However, we need more information. This wait has numerous steps with even
> more implications.
>
> First off, what makes you think this is THE issue?
>
> What are the following:
> "redo write time" statistic
> "log file parallel write" waits
>
> Is the system otherwise busy during high numbers of this event?
>
> It may not be as simple as just moving the redo logs to faster disks...
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Apr 08 2009 - 00:27:43 CDT

Original text of this message