Re: views on views on views
From: Nuno Souto <dbvision_at_iinet.net.au>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:09:45 +1100
Message-ID: <49CCC209.1070608_at_iinet.net.au>
Stephens, Chris wrote,on my timestamp of 27/03/2009 2:27 AM:
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:09:45 +1100
Message-ID: <49CCC209.1070608_at_iinet.net.au>
Stephens, Chris wrote,on my timestamp of 27/03/2009 2:27 AM:
>
> Do other people on the list have to contend with this issue?
Yup...
>
> Have you gotten the developers to agree to limiting their use of views
> in this way?
I found physical threats worked very well.
> Have any of you successfully dealt with the issue and if so, what
> arguments did you make that allowed for that?
No more than one level of view.
View on view guarantees them one place: the door.
Works wonders.
-- Cheers Nuno Souto in sunny Sydney, Australia dbvision_at_iinet.net.au -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Mar 27 2009 - 07:09:45 CDT