Re: Multiple oracle_home's Q

From: Jack van Zanen <jack_at_vanzanen.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:49:23 +1100
Message-ID: <77a615a70903181449r6fc9f379xdd38301b96ecd76f_at_mail.gmail.com>



I would run with a new oracle home.

No point of going with 10.2.0.2 if 10.2.0.3 is available Al it is is a little extra disk space anyway

Brgds

Jack
2009/3/19 Sweetser, Joe <JSweetser_at_icat.com>

> Forgot one thing: the "older" apps are only certified on 10.2.0.2 so I
> cannot upgrade the existing ORACLE_HOME.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sweetser, Joe
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 3:36 PM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Multiple oracle_home's Q
>
> Quick question - just looking for opinions and/or experiences.
>
> I have a current 10.2.0.2 Oracle environment running on RH Linux. We
> are adding a new COTS application to the existing server. The
> application vendor recommends running 10.2.0.3 with p4725385 (DBMS_STATS
> ON PARTITIONED IOT WITH ADDITIONAL INDEXES IS TOO SLOW) though they say
> their app can be run on 10.2.0.2.
>
> Would you think it's better run in the existing 10.2.0.2 env or install
> a 2nd ORACLE_HOME with 10.2.0.3 plus the patch? Assume there are plenty
> of resources (disk, cpu, memory) to handle either configuration....since
> that's what I'm doing. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> -joe
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Jack van Zanen

-------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the
sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Mar 18 2009 - 16:49:23 CDT

Original text of this message