RE: future of ocfs2

From: QuijadaReina, Julio C <QuijadJC_at_alfredstate.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:06:09 -0500
Message-ID: <BB794FBF96457F46A52B68230BC23AF60D99F043B2_at_mail4.alfredstate.edu>

Alan,

We got 2.6 kernels. I'll keep this in mind for the next upgrade.

Julio

-----Original Message-----

From: alanbort_at_gmail.com [mailto:alanbort_at_gmail.com] On Behalf Of Guillermo Alan Bort Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:51 AM To: QuijadaReina, Julio C
Cc: exriscer_at_gmail.com; jeremy.schneider_at_ardentperf.com; ocfs2-users_at_oss.oracle.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: future of ocfs2

Not in 2.6 kernels with ASM.

hth
Alan Bort
Oracle Certified Associate
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:06:09 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: nilesh kumar: "archive logs are not getting transferred to standby"
Previous message: Guillermo Alan Bort: "Re: future of ocfs2"
In reply to: Guillermo Alan Bort: "Re: future of ocfs2"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message