RE: brain dead
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:02:12 -0600 (CST)
Great article. Interesting historical perspective. Someone must have had a crystal ball looking into the future.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 12:51 PM
Cc: niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com; oracle-l Subject: Re: brain dead
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Tim Gorman <tim_at_evdbt.com> wrote:
As far as the SERVICE_NAMES parameter, I'm not sure why the document likes to identify each of the instances/nodes as separate services (i.e. CHICAGO1, CHICAGO2, BOSTON1, BOSTON2, etc). Personally, I've always tended to match the SERVICE_NAMES to the DB_NAME, unless I'm trying to do something fancy like host multiple applications within ...
Jeremy Schneider has a good paper on the history and use of SERVICE_NAMES
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist