RE: v$sql vs v$sqlarea difference ??

From: Allen, Brandon <>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:33:02 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E10A3268ECD@ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>

I believe it's partially possible - some of the cursor may be in the shared pool, while other parts may be aged out, for example it could appear in v$sql, but not in v$sqlplan - maybe that's what the OP was getting at. This document explains what I'm talking about in terms of heap 0 vs. heap 6 starting on page 8:


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Yong Huang Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: v$sql vs v$sqlarea difference ??

> *But i am still not clear, someone told me v$sql may contains
> objects not exists in Shared pool, which i am also not clear,

That's not possible. Where did you read that?

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Received on Mon Dec 29 2008 - 22:33:02 CST

Original text of this message