RE: db_recovery_file_dest_size
From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:35:34 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E10A31E9F26@ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:35:34 -0700
Message-ID: <64BAF54438380142A0BF94A23224A31E10A31E9F26@ONEWS06.oneneck.corp>
I forgot to mention another option - just don't use the flash recovery area at all.
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Fontana
What is really bizarre about this parameter is exactly what you describe, Jon. It has no real bearing on reality. I can set it to some mythical number much higher than the actual file system, and I can set it to 80mg with a 20tb database.
So what's the point of it?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Dec 19 2008 - 14:35:34 CST