RE: how many CSS deamons required per DB

From: Bort, Guillermo <guillermo.bort_at_eds.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 06:01:28 -0600
Message-ID: <785A4E1EF4D9E745BAC909B7941BEC00AFB6B3@usplm201.amer.corp.eds.com>


Agreed, however having listener downtime (needed for upgrade to ASM home) is as hard because it would effectiveley deny access to database. An argument can be made to support using the RDBMS Home listener during the upgrade of the ASM home... Still, I think that applying patchsets to Oracle RDBMS is a good idea, as well as applying CPUs. And any other issue where you might need to apply a patch for a certain database (one off for a bug?) would imply shutting down every instance on the home.

So to guarantee maximum availability you should separate each database in its own home (which would give most DBAs a headache, but has *certain* advantages). This means greater flexibility, but in the eventuality that you need to apply a patchset, you'd have to do it five times over.

hth

Guillermo Alan Bort
DBA / DBA Main Team

EDS, an HP company

-----Original Message-----
From: hrishy [mailto:hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 9:57 AM To: Martin Berger; Bort, Guillermo
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: how many CSS deamons required per DB

Hi

Why not the listener from ASM home.

My reasoning is as a Operational DBA (as opposed to a application DBA in this project)i can always upgrade the ASM to the latest version in terms of patches etc and can have my listener css etc upgraded to teh latest version.

I would not be so lucky trying to wade through the beurcracry of patching the Oracle home as the databases belong to different line of Business and try to convince everybody would be tough for me

regards
Hrishy

  • On Mon, 1/12/08, Bort, Guillermo <guillermo.bort_at_eds.com> wrote:

> From: Bort, Guillermo <guillermo.bort_at_eds.com>
> Subject: RE: how many CSS deamons required per DB
> To: hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk, "Martin Berger" <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Date: Monday, 1 December, 2008, 11:38 AM
> Right for CSS, wrong for listener. In my experience,
> it's bettet to run listener from the DB home. Actually,
> come to think of it... I think I never run listener from
> another home.
>
> Guillermo Alan Bort
> DBA / DBA Main Team
>
> EDS, an HP company
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of hrishy
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: Martin Berger
> Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: how many CSS deamons required per DB
>
> Hi Martin
>
> I am planning to use
>
> One Oracle home for my ASM instance
> and another oracle home for all my Db Currently 5 of them
>
> But i prefer to run my listeners and CSS from ASM home is
> my idea right ?
>
> regards
> Hrishy
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> †Ûiÿü0ÁúÞzX¬¶Ê+ƒün– {ú+iÉ^
      

i0zX+n{+i^ Received on Mon Dec 01 2008 - 06:01:28 CST

Original text of this message