RE: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:44:25 -0500
Message-ID: <BE967230733F4EFFAFA144332CE6CBB6@rsiz.com>

Yes, there should only be 1 OS. But we've never been able to get Met Life to open source DTSS.

I believe that will make at least 5 people smile in remembrance and perhaps a couple dozen groan.

Happy Thanksgiving!

mwf

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of John Thompson
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 1:23 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?

Thinking long-term here, it seems 1 OS would allow incredible growth in utilization of existing technology.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Nov 26 2008 - 14:44:25 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Wolfgang Breitling: "Re: opinions on sox requirement AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS=true"
Previous message: Claudia Zeiler: "Searching for a way to move a database cross platform with minimal down time"
In reply to: John Thompson: "Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?"
Next in thread: Nuno Souto: "Re: Should there only be 1 OS, or multiple?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message